Monique Javer vs Claire Sessions Bailey Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Javer 1 - 0 Bailey

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Javer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bailey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Javer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bailey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Javer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bailey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Javer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bailey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Javer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 72/ 94), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 31% (W/L 11/ 24). Bailey has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 18/ 26).
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Javer winning 1 times and Bailey being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Javer winning 2 and Bailey winning 0. The last match between Javer and Bailey was at the ITF Sedona, 09-10-1995, Q2 round, Hard with Monique Javer getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Javer and Bailey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Javer winning 0 times and Bailey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Javer winning 0, and Bailey 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Javer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bailey has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Javer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bailey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Javer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bailey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)